Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little St. Nick Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Little St. Nick Foundation

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Little St. Nick Foundation

Little St. Nick Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources are created by the organization itself. No sign it is in any way notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Found one local, independent source, FoxNews-St. Louis news report, but otherwise, not generally known. SW3 5DL (talk) 02:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete -- no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.